Re: File system of choice?
David Severance <[email protected]> Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:15:10 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.imap.uw.c-client |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrew Daviel wrote: > On Thu, 13 May 2010, Yiorgos Adamopoulos wrote: >> We manage ~100K mailboxes which will be migrated on new servers. The >> mailbox format is mbx (expetced to change to mix after the migration) >> and the Operating System will be Linux amd64. So, on what filesystem >> would one place them? Currently we are thinking of putting them on >> XFS. > Some time back I did some benchmarks with "mailstone", and decided in > the end to go with XFS on Linux. JFS was also fairly good. Now there > is ext4; haven't tried that for mail, it's still somewhat > experimental. I used it on Fedora 9 for a while but things crashed > (possibly unrelated) and the absence of ext4 support in the rescue > disk killed me. It did seem significantly faster than ext3. > > Since then, we tried using XFS on iSCSI which was a disaster, at least > under RHEL 4. RHEL6, currently in beta and due towards the end of the year, has builtin support for both XFS and EXT4. I am looking forward to testing these as replacements for my conservative, but fully functional, EXT3 over iSCSI on RHEL4 setup. fyi, David