Re: alternate ldap schema
"Lloyd H. Meinholz" <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:29:03 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.jamm.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Maybe a simpler way to ask the question is: can I authenticate a user that is not under the jvd hierarchy? If not, this would mean that a user needs an LDAP account for our web sites and another for our email system. Lloyd On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 12:30, Keith T. Garner wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:13:39, Lloyd H. Meinholz said: > > I have a large existing ldap database. I would prefer to use what > > currently exists and not have to move all my email users under the > > o=hosting tree. Can I modify this through configuration files or is it > > much more complicated than this? > > o=hosting is not hardwired anywhere. That can be modified via the > config files. There are some assumptions made about the structure > under the base dn. > > base_dn > +----jvd > | +--- postmaster > | +--- aliases/accounts > +----jvd > +--- postmaster > > > For example, would it be possible to > > create mail users under the jvd tree by adding existing users in another > > branch as uniqueUsers to the jvd? Thanks, > > I'm having a slow Monday morning....What do you mean by this? What > would the tree (and its elements) look like? > > Keith ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click