Re: alternate ldap schema
"Keith T. Garner" <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:58:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.jamm.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:29:03, Lloyd H. Meinholz said: > Maybe a simpler way to ask the question is: can I authenticate a user > that is not under the jvd hierarchy? With jamm or postfix or what? I don't see anything stopping it, but I'm not sure how useful jamm will be in this circumstance. > If not, this would mean that a user needs an LDAP account for our web > sites and another for our email system. My main concern is how Jamm would edit those entries. Its a structure that jamm knows nothing about it and everything would probably explode. Give it a try, let us know what happens. ;) Keith -- Keith T. Garner [email protected] "Make no little plans; they have no magic to stir men's blood." - Daniel H. Burnham ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click