Re: Postfix 2.1
"Keith T. Garner" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.jamm.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:14:35, John Dunsire said: > Just a quick question. Anybody know of problems using Jamm with Postfix > 2.1? I'm building a new Jamm server and wanted to know whether or not to > stick with Postfix 2.0 or use 2.1. I just installed 2.1 over 2.0 two days ago and I have no problems. Most of what the virtual mail system needs hasn't changed in interface. Also, the LDAP code is supposed to have been rewritten, so there may actually be a performance boost. Keith -- Keith T. Garner [email protected] The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. --Bertrand Russell ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click