Re: Moving into LDAP for user auth, a few Q's
"Keith T. Garner" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.jamm.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 11:21:47, Andy Ciordia said: > We've used jamm now for a couple years with great success.. Now I'm > trying to roll out the office's authentication to use LDAP and having a > single-signon for mail would be nice but as it stands having the hosts > in ou=hosting won't allow for me to tie the users 1:1 their email. > > I'm reading up on best practices and methodologies, so I haven't really > flushed out exactly what is up but I'd like to hear from anyone who runs > their jamm w/ an active ou=people (or something similiar). A guy I know has been asking me about something similar. I'd be open to a schema change for Jamm to work better with setups like this. I haven't been able to come up with one though. One thing to look into is LDAP referrals, but I haven't learned that voodoo magic yet. I haven't tried to integrate the two, so I'm no help. Keith -- Keith T. Garner [email protected] The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. --Bertrand Russell ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3