Re: wxHIDE_READONLY

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:56 pm, Nerijus Baliunas wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:38:17 +1000 Mark Livingstone
> <[email protected]> wrote: ML> Could someone confirm this is
> actually getting through as I've sent it to the ML> group and emailed Vadim
> for the past week or more and gotten no reply :-(
>
> It is getting through, you should be getting your messages from the list.
>

I have been but since I didn't get a reply, I wanted to make sure everyone 
else was :-)

> IMHO it's impossible to disable 2.6 compatibility (btw, why do you want it?
> 2.7 was just recently branched, and you already want to disable 2.6
> compatibility?!) while keeping 2.4 compatibility, as the code in 2.4
> compatible sections might use 2.6 compatible one. You can do the other way
> around - disable 2.4 and enable 2.6. But in this (Mahogany) case you want
> both enabled.

Because wxHIDE_READONLY has been defined in it's relevant .h file as being a 
2.4 compatible feature. If you can tell me how to make M against the current 
2.7 CVS HEAD without worrying about compatibility #defines, I'm all ears :-)

TIA

MarkL


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.  Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course.  Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click