Re: attachments include directory structure information (but shouldn't?)
Vadim Zeitlin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mahogany.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 25 May 2004 10:01:23 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Alan G Isaac <[email protected]> wrote: AGI> I just noticed an attachment I sent from Mahogany has the AGI> following header: AGI> AGI> Content-Type: APPLICATION/OCTET-STREAM; NAME="f:\\todo\\isaac4mh.questions20040528.doc" AGI> Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 AGI> Content-Disposition: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME="isaac4mh.questions20040528.doc" AGI> AGI> I think an earlier discussion led Vadim to agree that AGI> directory structure should not be included with attachments, AGI> so I am guessing there is a small bug in filling the "NAME" AGI> field? Yes, you're right, I've just fixed this. In fact, we could probably drop "NAME" all together as all more or less recent MUAs should use the disposition parameter instead but OTOH it probably doesn't hurt to keep it neither... Thanks, VZ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND