Re: messages trough majordomo get queued, EX_TEMPFAIL msg.
Matias Lopez Bergero <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.majordomo.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel Liston wrote: > Load Average is different for every machine. If you have statistical > information regarding your machines "normal" load vs. "high" load, I > would set the max_loadavg in majordomo.cf to your high mark. You do > not want majordomo to be the cause of pushing your machine over the > edge. Thank you Daniel, I'll set it according to the sar reports. BR, Matias. > Matias Lopez Bergero wrote: > >>Daniel Liston wrote: >> >> >>>Does this email come from the same server as your majordomo? Is any >>>other user of the system having trouble getting mail to the outside >>>world? As the root user, can you "mail -s test [email protected]"? >>> >>>The real question I am asking, is if your sendmail is working. If not, >>>there is no way for majordomo to work, because it depends entirely on >>>your MTA for email delivery. Mail might come in ok, and work between >>>internal mailboxes, without being able to talk to the rest of the 'net. >> >> >>Yes, the MTA was working fine, and that was what get me confused. But I >>have already solved the problem. >>The problem was entirely my fault. >> >>Wen the messages via majordomo started to arrive late, from four to six >>hours of delay, I comment out the line that sets the max_loadavg >>variable at the majordomo.conf. Looks like without this line majordomo >>waits for the system to have 0 load average :-P. >> >>So, after burning my brain, I try setting this parameter again, and >>things works out. I feel like kind of idiot, but shit happens :-D >> >>Now I have a question, what would be a good value to set this >>configuration variable? >> >>Thanks for your help Daniel. >> >>BR, >>Matias. >> >> >> >> >>>Matias Lopez Bergero wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hello Daniel, >>>> >>>>Daniel Liston wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Has anything been installed on your server that could have replaced the >>>>>/etc/smrsh/wrapper link to /usr/local/majordomo/wrapper? >>>> >>>> >>>>no, nothing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Has the machine been busy (high cpu) where majordomo might not be able >>>>>to pass mail to the MTA? >>>> >>>> >>>>Yes, I change the $max_loadavg value to release this a little bit, but >>>>the load isn't to much anyway. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>When you refer to messages sent directly to a mailbox, do you mean by >>>>>majordomo or by some other source? >>>> >>>> >>>>Sorry, I mean sending a mail to a local user from a local account or a >>>>remote one. The message is received with no delay at all. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Considering the failure is temporary, does the mail eventually get >>>>>delivered? >>>> >>>> >>>>I was happening that the message was getting in after four to six hours >>>>later, but now is getting even worst, I haven't get a single message >>>>trough majordomo since yesterday >>>> >>>>I have tons of similar problems reports over the list and other mailing >>>>lists, but no one haves give me a clue of where the problem maybe. >>>>I configured sendmail to run without smrsh and the error was the same >>>>but instead smrsh was /bin/sh. >>>> >>>>Thank you, >>>>Matias. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Dan Liston >>>>> >>>>>Matias Lopez Bergero wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>>The last days I am having this problem, it seems that all the messages >>>>>>that goes trough majordomo are getting queued, here is a mailq output: >>>>>> >>>>>>kBKFLeZP009438 0 30769 Dec 20 12:21 owner-prueba >>>>>> (Deferred: prog mailer (/usr/sbin/smrsh) exited with >>>>>>EX_TEMPFAIL) >>>>>> >>>>>>(---prueba:8:0:<[email protected]>---) >>>>>> >>>>>>"|/usr/local/majordomo/wrapper resend -l prueba prueba-list-00FF >>>>>> (Deferred: prog mailer (/usr/sbin/smrsh) exited with >>>>>>EX_TEMPFAIL) >>>>>> >>>>>>A message sent directly to a mailbox get passed without a problem. >>>>>>I have completely no idea of what is happening, >>>>>>Any help is most welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>>Thanks, >>>>>>Matias >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >