Re: bounce / bounce-remind not working properly
Ed Kasky <[email protected]> Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:41:50 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.majordomo.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 10:40 PM Monday, 9/1/2008, Joe R. Jah wrote -=> >On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Ed Kasky wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 12:48:26 -0700 > > From: Ed Kasky <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: bounce / bounce-remind not working properly > > > > I just realized that the bounce / bounce-remind scripts are not doing > > everything they should be doing. The message from bounce-remind says: > > > > "The comment for each address shows the date it was moved, > > and the first list it was removed from." > > > > However it does not contain the list or the date, just the email > address that > > was moved to the bounces list. > > > > Majordomo 1.94.5 > > bounce is Revision: 1.11, 2000/01/07 14:09:24 patched with bounce.2 > > bounce-remind is Revision: 1.9, 1996/12/09 16:49:46 > > > > Where is it supposed to keep that information? > > > > Ed > >http://www.greatcircle.com/majordomo/FAQ.html#3.2 That much I get. It's the following in the faq and the instructions that is not happening: "The majordomo maintainer then runs (out of cron) the 'bounce-remind' script periodically, which sends mail to all the people on the bounces list, saying essentially "you were removed from list 'foo' because mail to you bounced. To subscribe yourself back to the list, send the following commands ...". There's no facility yet for trimming the bounces list, but it's easy to write one because the date the person was added to the bounces list is included" The date is included in the email from 'bounce' but not 'bounce-remind' to the user. Should the date be included somewhere in the bounces list? Ed ........................................................................... Randomly Generated Quote (1026 of 1434): Readers may be divided into four classes: 1. Sponges, who absorb all that they read and return it in nearly the same state, only a little dirtied. 2. Sand-glasses, who retain nothing and are content to get through a book for the sake of getting through the time. 3. Strain-bags, who retain merely the dregs of what they read. 4. Mogul diamonds, equally rare and valuable, who profit by what they read, and enable others to profit by it also. -Samuel Taylor Coleridge, poet, critic (1772-1834)