Re: "set-check" warning

On 13 Jan 14:28, Brock Rozen wrote:
> >The "next" statement on line 1047 will go to the next iteration of the
> >loop,  so the debugging statement should be used on the previous line
> >instead.
> 
> --== The flag value is [email protected] at blib/lib/Mj/List.pm 
> (autosplit into blib/lib/auto/Mj/List/get_setting_data.al) line 1047.
> --== Use of uninitialized value in string eq at blib/lib/Mj/List.pm 
> (autosplit into blib/lib/auto/Mj/List/get_setting_data.al) line 1048.

So, the e-mail address has been added to the list of possible delivery
classes somehow.  Does the following patch solve the problem without
causing any side effects?

Michael

--- lib/Mj/List.pm      11 Nov 2005 20:50:12 -0000      1.158
+++ lib/Mj/List.pm      13 Jan 2006 19:18:16 -0000
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@
       $rset = $flags{$inv}->[0];
       $isflag = $inv;
     }
-    elsif ($rset = $classes{$class[0]}->[0]) {
+    elsif (exists $classes{$class[0]} and $rset = $classes{$class[0]}->[0]) {
       $isflag = 0;
     }
     else {