Re: Enhancement request: additional actions for bounce_rules

On 27 Feb 21:59, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> It's been suggested for some of our lists that, rather then 
> unsubscribing on bounces, we set nomail -- people have grown used to the 
> Yahoo idea of "bouncing address" management, and we can also use 
> inactive_lifetime to deal with subsequent removal.  (One list-owner even 
> requested to set digest on bounces -- weird to me, but, hey...)

How would you distinguish addresses that have been set to "nomail" by
bounces from addresses that have been set by the users?

Michael