Re: Inheritance question.
"Steven W. Orr" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:59:24 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.majordomo.majordomo2.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | SysLang |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday, Sep 4th 2007 at 09:30 -0500, quoth Jason L Tibbitts III: =>>>>>> "SWO" == Steven W Orr <[email protected]> writes: => =>SWO> The taboo_body says it's coming from the installationm settings =>SWO> and not from the DEFAULT:nounsub setting even though I did a =>SWO> configdef frammod taboo_body. => =>GLOBAL's taboo_body is not inherited; it is always checked in order to =>simulate Majordomo 1's $global_taboo_body configuration setting. If =>you want to use inheritance and such, don't set it. Ok. But I'm still having problems. Here's the new setup: Majordomo>configshow DEFAULT:nounsub taboo_body configset DEFAULT:nounsub taboo_body <<ENDABH /\bunsubscribe\b/i ENDABH Majordomo>configshow frambors config_defaults configset frambors config_defaults <<ENDABI plaintext rfc2369 nounsub ENDABI configdef frambors taboo_body Majordomo>configshow frambors taboo_body # This value was determined by the installation settings. configset frambors taboo_body <<ENDABK ENDABK So I'm still not getting the taboo_body I want. What am I missing? -- Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0. happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0 Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000 individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? steveo at syslang.net