Re: Inheritance question.

"Steven W. Orr" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Sep 2007 10:59:24 -0400 (EDT)
Newsgroups gmane.mail.majordomo.majordomo2.devel
Organization SysLang
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday, Sep 4th 2007 at 09:30 -0500, quoth Jason L Tibbitts III:

=>>>>>> "SWO" == Steven W Orr <[email protected]> writes:
=>
=>SWO> The taboo_body says it's coming from the installationm settings
=>SWO> and not from the DEFAULT:nounsub setting even though I did a
=>SWO> configdef frammod taboo_body.
=>
=>GLOBAL's taboo_body is not inherited; it is always checked in order to
=>simulate Majordomo 1's $global_taboo_body configuration setting.  If
=>you want to use inheritance and such, don't set it.

Ok. But I'm still having problems. Here's the new setup:

Majordomo>configshow DEFAULT:nounsub taboo_body
configset DEFAULT:nounsub taboo_body <<ENDABH
/\bunsubscribe\b/i
ENDABH

Majordomo>configshow frambors config_defaults
configset frambors config_defaults <<ENDABI
plaintext
rfc2369
nounsub
ENDABI

configdef frambors taboo_body

Majordomo>configshow frambors taboo_body
# This value was determined by the installation settings.
configset frambors taboo_body <<ENDABK
ENDABK

So I'm still not getting the taboo_body I want. What am I missing?

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net