Need clarification of "terminal action" in access_rules
"Steven W. Orr" <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:56:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.majordomo.majordomo2.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | SysLang |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig27C3537BA7A3242EA6875354 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Given that forward and deny are both described as terminal in the help, T= his seems to allow the forward to happen and that the deny works after it. post [email protected], deny, replyfile=3DUnsubFoundInText $admin_unsub >=3D 50 What does not seem to work is to change the forward to a consult, a la post consult, reason=3D"Unsub found in text", deny, replyfile=3DUnsubFoundInTe= xt $admin_unsub >=3D 50 I get no consult from this. Is the doc wrong? --=20 Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have= .0. happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Orga= n ..0 Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all= - 000 individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question? steveo at syslang.net --------------enig27C3537BA7A3242EA6875354 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrmb1IACgkQRIVy4fC+NyT/XwCfYGyWwlcb0Jwyc6FxRYWH2lcv /hkAn30rRc9ECV6VMjxJciqUUUOdqrnm =4kU6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig27C3537BA7A3242EA6875354--