Need clarification of "terminal action" in access_rules

"Steven W. Orr" <[email protected]> Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:56:02 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.mail.majordomo.majordomo2.devel
Organization SysLang
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig27C3537BA7A3242EA6875354
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Given that forward and deny are both described as terminal in the help, T=
his
seems to allow the forward to happen and that the deny works after it.

post
[email protected], deny, replyfile=3DUnsubFoundInText
$admin_unsub >=3D 50

What does not seem to work is to change the forward to a consult, a la

post
consult, reason=3D"Unsub found in text", deny, replyfile=3DUnsubFoundInTe=
xt
$admin_unsub >=3D 50

I get no consult from this. Is the doc wrong?

--=20
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have=
  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Orga=
n ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all=
- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net


--------------enig27C3537BA7A3242EA6875354
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkrmb1IACgkQRIVy4fC+NyT/XwCfYGyWwlcb0Jwyc6FxRYWH2lcv
/hkAn30rRc9ECV6VMjxJciqUUUOdqrnm
=4kU6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig27C3537BA7A3242EA6875354--