Re: Need clarification of "terminal action" in access_rules
Michael Yount <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:07:54 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.majordomo.majordomo2.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
When a message is stalled because of a "consult" action, you could just as easily send an explanation immediately, encouraging the subscriber to resubmit with corrections instead of waiting for the list owner to review the message. Michael Steven W. Orr wrote: > The problem is that when people send to the list and we *know* that it's > always going to result in a deny, then the use of the deny command gives the > poster instant feedback. If we go to using a consult then the amount of time > between the post and the reject is usually short (< an hour or two) but it > could be as much as a day or more.