Re: Anyone using my DMARC avoidance patch?
Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[email protected]> Sat, 24 May 2014 14:11:20 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.majordomo.majordomo2.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 15 May 2014, at 18:34, Dean Collins = <[email protected]> wrote: > Wish I could try it. >=20 > A few years ago, I managed to install MJ2 on an Ensim-controlled = server that > used Sendmail. I loved MJ2! I even managed to train a bunch of = hesitant > listkeepers, and they loved MJ2, too. I think there are quite a few of us love the general =93Vibe=94 of MJ2. = Sadly it=92s obsolete software, and you get all the problems that come = with obsolescence on modern OSs/configurations. That means, for all = practical purposes, that I=92m not using it. :( I have had very, very unclean thoughts about buying LISTSERV(R) *. = Being nonprofit, these thoughts are not ones I like to entertain very = much, but when Mailman/Sympa are the only remaining options and our = members complain about the inflexibility of both, I fear that I must put = it on the cards, or snap and write something for myself. Fact is that = deferring everything to a web interface, and storing your data in = non-portable formats (or requiring RDBMSs!!!) just suck as options for = running many highly-moderated, small virtual-hosted lists from a single = computer. Rumours that Mailman 3 will somehow save us don't inspire me; = they have no planned web interface, which would be good news in and of = itself, but the mediocre performance of MM2 says to me that we will = probably be putting up with more of the same nonsense going forward. = This having been said, the people have apparently spoken=97web hosts are = using Mailman, and there is a tendency to reject anything that is not on = the web and doesn=92t produce high-impact results, regardless of = inflexibility. Therefore I can=92t imagine a repeat of something like = MJ2, except to serve a very small minority of discerning listmasters. > I really, really dislike Mailman. I just looked over Sympa again, and they do appear to have got somewhat = better since I last looked (LDAP, sqlite). It=92s still web-based = though, and you still need a separate DMARC patch. You might like to = check it out. Cheers, Sabahattin