[mew-int 2674] Re: Why Mew always choose ISO-2022-JP-2 to send mails ? 牛
Harald Hanche-Olsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mew.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
+ vvoody <[email protected]>: > Mew ^_^ > > In the end of subject of this mail, there was a Chinese > character. But as you can see, it was encoded by ISO-2022-JP-2 not > GB2312 or UTF-8. So that, the recipients will see the gibberish :( And as you can see, my mew encoded it as UTF-8. > GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (GTK+ Version 2.12.12) > > I also have Emacs 22.2.3 installed on my system. When I ran Mew on > 22, Mew chosen GB2312 to send my Chinese mails correctly. I have GNU Emacs 23.0.60.2 (powerpc-apple-darwin9.5.0, NS apple-appkit-949.35) of 2008-11-29. I have these settings in my .mew.el: (setq mew-ask-charset '("us-ascii" "iso-8859-1" "iso-8859-15" "utf-8")) (setq mew-internal-utf-8p t) (setq mew-cs-database-for-encoding '(((ascii) nil "7bit" "7bit") ((ascii iso-8859-1) iso-8859-1 "8bit" "Q") ((ascii latin-iso8859-1) iso-8859-1 "quoted-printable" "Q") (nil utf-8 "base64" "Q"))) But please note that my .mew.el is quite old, it has been through innumerable versions of mew as well as emacs, so I don't know if all of the above is relevant anymore. I generally only go in and fix things when they break. 8-) In particular, I expect you can ignore the mew-cs-database-for-encoding bit: I think I put it there because the vast majority of my mail is latin-1, and I wanted 8-bit encoding for the benefit of my many correspondents who, many years ago, used mail programs that didn't understand MIME. (But I am including it anyhow just in case it helps.) + Tatsuya Kinoshita <[email protected]>: > BTW, Emacs 23 is drastically changed from Emacs 22, and Mew has not > yet been well tested with it. At this time, Emacs 23 isn't a > recommendable version for Mew. While this may be true, I have had very few problems with it. Emacs 23 is getting better and more stable all the time, and if I understand recent noises on the emacs-devel list right, it is soon ready for the official pretest phase. - Harald