Re: Sender Address Verification
Richard Laager <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mimedefang |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/22/2016 12:55 PM, Bill Cole wrote: > the SAV rule was never decisive in a correct SA 'spam' determination Thanks for sharing. This is good information. I've made a note to re-evaluate my SAV rules after the holiday. I have some test harnesses to determine whether an individual rule "made a difference" in the outcome of the spam decision. If it turns out it's useless for me, I can rip out my SAV code, which is a win regardless of one's viewpoint on whether it is abusive. -- Richard _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang