Re: resending mails from quarantine, modify Message-ID or use Resent-Headers?
Marcus Schopen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mimedefang |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Dienstag, den 03.01.2017, 19:58 +0100 schrieb Peter Bonivart: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Marcus Schopen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm playing around with resending quarantined emails, if the user wants > > them to be delivered and check locally. I set Resent-Headers in those > > resent messages, so that cyrus delivers and doesn't drop them as > > duplicates. Some users users pop their mailboxes with exchange or > > popcon. Any experiences out there, if those messages get dropped by pop > > clients because of the same Message-ID or should I better change the > > original Message-ID header to something like X-Orig-Message-ID and set a > > new Message-ID header? > > Exchange has had a duplicate message protection looking at the message > ID for a long time. I generate a new message ID to avoid that. Thanks Peter! I will set a new Message-ID too then. Do remove the old Message-ID header or do you change it to X-Orig-Message-ID to keep it? And do you set Resent-Date, Resent-From, Resent-To, Resent-Message-ID headers too? Ciao Marcus -- ,---- [ Marcus Schopen ] | (0> | //\ | V_/_ D-33602 Bielefeld | `---- _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang