Re: Mulberry - the future?

lyrabee <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.mulberry.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
hey guys,

for 12 years now i'm using mulberry. started on windows and continued 
on mac os since 2008. i also tried several other email clients, but i 
think mulberry still is the only one to fit my needs. it works with 
imap so fast! always, when i have to use thunderbird because of some 
html email i have received, i'm "in awe" how slow tb is with mailboxes 
containing thousands of emails.

with every mac os x update i hope mulberry will still work. so far it 
does (currently i'm still on mountain lion), and i hope it will 
"forever" - maybe with some basic fixes by cyrus in case it doesn't 
meet the needs of whatever mac os version :)

anyways: many thanks, cyrus, for the best email client ever - for me! :)

lyrabee


--On 13. Februar 2014 09:19:34 -0500 Gleason Pace <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>
> Andy,
>
>
>> Gosh, my little missive certainly woke this list up!   :-)
>
>> Nice to know there are still some Mulberry afficionados out there.
>
>> I do actually still use a non-IMSP localized version of Mulberry
>> for certain tasks, partly because it's just about the only mail
>> client I know with a 'redirect' function.
>
> If you really want an alternative, The Bat does have that function.
> And TB has greatly improved overall in recent years with frequent
> updates.
>
>>   It is possible to do the
>> same in Outlook but you have to jump through several hoops to do so.
>> In Mulberry it's just a button click (and a bit of typing).
>
>> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>  Gleason
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.