Re: Mulberry - the future?
lyrabee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hey guys, for 12 years now i'm using mulberry. started on windows and continued on mac os since 2008. i also tried several other email clients, but i think mulberry still is the only one to fit my needs. it works with imap so fast! always, when i have to use thunderbird because of some html email i have received, i'm "in awe" how slow tb is with mailboxes containing thousands of emails. with every mac os x update i hope mulberry will still work. so far it does (currently i'm still on mountain lion), and i hope it will "forever" - maybe with some basic fixes by cyrus in case it doesn't meet the needs of whatever mac os version :) anyways: many thanks, cyrus, for the best email client ever - for me! :) lyrabee --On 13. Februar 2014 09:19:34 -0500 Gleason Pace <[email protected]> wrote: > > Andy, > > >> Gosh, my little missive certainly woke this list up! :-) > >> Nice to know there are still some Mulberry afficionados out there. > >> I do actually still use a non-IMSP localized version of Mulberry >> for certain tasks, partly because it's just about the only mail >> client I know with a 'redirect' function. > > If you really want an alternative, The Bat does have that function. > And TB has greatly improved overall in recent years with frequent > updates. > >> It is possible to do the >> same in Outlook but you have to jump through several hoops to do so. >> In Mulberry it's just a button click (and a bit of typing). > >> Andy > > > > > > -- > Gleason >