Re: Mulberry - the future?
"Joel L. Rosenblatt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAM+TzrTNLnPT1mwrcb0QTz6SA5QPHEc5_L5TL_DAFjF+QydjcA@mail.gmail.com> |
Since my wife also works at Columbia, and she is usually the one who has to be in, the chances are very small :-) I understand your point, but that is the reason that everyone want's a calendar system - it was one of the main driving forces behind moving to gmail Joel Joel Rosenblatt, Director Network & Computer Security Columbia Information Security Office (CISO) Columbia University, 612 W 115th Street, NY, NY 10025 / 212 854 3033 http://www.columbia.edu/~joel Public PGP key http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x90BD740BCC7326C3 On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Steven Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: > That's my point - when I'm free or busy is for me to decide because it doesn't depend only on other scheduled events. Do you put "think I'll sleep late with my wife Tuesday" in your calendar? > Steve > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:51 AM, "Joel L. Rosenblatt" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It's not to manage your own calendar - it's so that you can see >> everyone elses calendar to schedule meetings >> >> They can't see my meetings, but they can see when I'm free/busy >> >> Joel >> >> >> Joel Rosenblatt, Director Network & Computer Security >> Columbia Information Security Office (CISO) >> Columbia University, 612 W 115th Street, NY, NY 10025 / 212 854 3033 >> http://www.columbia.edu/~joel >> Public PGP key >> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x90BD740BCC7326C3 >> >> >>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Steven Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I have to say that I don't understand the desire for a networked calendar system. The one time I was forced to use one (with Palm) I always tricked it to make sure nobody could see my real calendar. None if their business, bosses or not! For 35 years I've scheduling my own appointments, thank you! >>> Steve >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Andy Clews <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Tim Walsh writes: >>>> >>>>> I've been following this with great interest. I am on the med school >>>>> faculty at Columbia, and picked up Mulberry years ago when it was one >>>>> of the Email clients supported by Columbia. (They dropped it when >>>>> Mulberry went under financially, I think.) >>>> >>>> That very nearly happened here at Sussex also. When Cyrusoft went under, there was a bit of a panic here because Mulberry was our main supported email client and hence there was a need for continuity; the bosses all seemed to think it would stop working overnight. We were just embarking on a client-replacement exercise when the news came through that Cyrus Daboo had reacquired the rights to Mulberry and had made it open source. At the time we were running Mulberry 3.1, but soon after we decided to upgrade to version 4.0.8 which was the last licensed version. As it was stable, we decided to stick with it, and so it remained for the next seven years, until the need for an all-in-one email/calendaring system (we had been using MeetingMaker, which was troublesome) brought about the move to Exchange and Outlook. >>>> >>>> Andy >>