Re: CardDAV Support
Martin Dietze <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Nov 2014 21:28:10 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC-dDpCgpVK-2J0tb_e8nMek=QRRPQk7jQpdNAfgax0jE6ztOw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 7 November 2014 17:07, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> wrote: > I suggest reading <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_%28API%29> > > and then > > <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3921472/migrating-an-application-from-carbon-to-cocoa> Thank you for those links. I had only a brief look (as I don’t see myself involved in this any time soon, due to my present work environment I hardly open the application these days). From what i browsed through, Carbon apps should still run in principle (just tried Mulberry on my yosemite MacBook, and it works fine so far), one will have to expect increasing compatibility / stability problems with forthcoming OS X versions, right? If the operating system supports those APIs then creating the necessary tooling for compiling against them is mainly a technical (and tedious) task. There are existing headers, and there is nm. So I don’t see any principle reason why it should not be *possible* to do this. However I share doubts that - if nobody else does it for us - we should do this ourselves. But that still leaves the question: who will at any time soon rewrite Mulberry’s GUI? We’ve had this discussion for quite some time now. I totally agree that GUI code should ideally be ideal for all supported platforms, and given the fact that we’re talking about a C++ application, QT is the most obvious choice. But somebody has to do this work. I don’t see that Cyrus is going to do this. I won’t either, so volunteers, step forward :) Cheers, Martin -- ---------- [email protected] --/-- [email protected] ---- ------------- / http://herbert.the-little-red-haired-girl.org / -------------