Re: SMTP problem...new builds
Quanah Gibson-Mount <[email protected]> Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:00:02 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0BD8E180DDB156A991958675@[192.168.1.9]> |
Someone posted a link to newer Windows builds of mulberry a while back, which I'm running. Unfortunately, it does have a lot of problems -- routine crashing, corruption of the outgoing smtp mailboxes, etc. Especially if the outgoing mail has attachments. As much as I love mulberry, it's about to the point where I can no longer use it. The newer mac builds also have loads of issues, and depend on the old Carbon bits, IIRC, which Apple will be removing in upcoming OSX, so it is pretty much dead as well, unless someone wants to rewrite the entire UI. --Quanah --On Thursday, March 05, 2015 1:44 PM -0500 [email protected] wrote: > > > --On 3/5/15 12:57 PM -0500 [email protected] wrote: > > > You also didn't mention whether you are still running Mulberry > 4.0.8 or if you switched to one of the development versions. > > Do you know the locations of these development versions? > Are any recommended as better, more stable? > > > My rather sad and pessimistic guess is that Mulberry isn't going > to survive many more Windows versions unless some very serious > maintenance work is done -- not good in combination with a > situation in which most of the work seems to be on Apple, Linux, > or Unix platforms. > > Are you saying Mulberry's survival rate on Apple, Unix is as bad as > Windows? > best, > john > > > 4.0.8 running well on a Mac OS 10.6.8. (Yeah, a little slow on updating > that, but then again how many important applications, like Mulberry, > would be skewed by updating?) > > > Thanks, > mu >