Re: Devin's effort
Gleason <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Apr 2015 09:04:25 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mulberry Developers, Maybe the point was that it sure would be nice to get a new release of Mulberry with fixes mentioned here for things like memory leaks, etc. Please oh please. Woncha, whydoncha? > On Tue Apr 14 22:53:49, David Gessell wrote: >> I am just moving back to Mulberry after a few years on Thunderbird >> when I couldn't get it to install on Win 7. It seems to work fine >> now. It is like coming home: I used Mulberry for many years and my >> preferences were still floating around and worked fine. > ? You couldn't get Thunderbird to install on windows 7? > We've been using Thunderbird in our 60+ user environment since about > version 0.8, and never had a problem installing any version on any > version of Windows, 7 works like a champ. >> Further, TB is abandonware as well. > Ummm... no, it isn't, not even close. Please do not spread FUD. > I was worried about this when Mozilla announced that it was pulling most > of its resources (they still provide a ton of infrastructure resources, > and that is not likely to change), but the reality is, Thunderbird > development seems to be thriving. There are a ton of old bugs finally > being worked on, and as far as I'm concerned, the change was a good thing. >> And Mulberry remains more modern and far more feature-complete than >> Claws and Sylpheed. > Maybe so, but being one who loves to investigate new mail clients, and > prompted by your email thread on the dovecot list wherein in in one of > your messages mentioned Mulberry, I decided to check it out again (been > many many years since I looked at it last). > I was really interested at first, and signed up for this list - then > while waiting on confirmations, read some of the most recent archives, > and was sad to see the thread(s) talking about the fact that it appears > that Mulberry is not long for this world. > For that reason I'm not sure why you would choose to move back to > something that looks like is on critical life-support, and not long for > this world? Of course you are free to do whatever you like, but > personally, I don't change mail clients (or other fundamental software I > use on a day to day basis) lightly... > Or maybe I'm mis-reading those emails - some even coming from Devin, who > appears to be the primary dev for Mulberry (is that right?)... > Charles -- Gleason