Re: Devin's effort
Tanstaafl <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:38:27 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 4/22/2015 11:51 PM, Ken Alker <[email protected]> wrote: > Things I like: > > 1) IMSP > > Although I think this protocol has been deprecated for years, I love it for > my address book store as well as my Mulberry Preferences. I use Mulberry > on multiple computers and all my local preferences are pushed to my IMSP > server. Each client on each computer pulls my prefs from my IMSpPserver > each time I launch Mulberry. It seems like many programs could benefit > from storage of prefs on a remote server. I'm surprised this hasn't caught > on. It makes a lot of sense in an IMAP environment. I agree and would love to have something like this! Thanks for the pointer... Question: what IMAP server are you using now? And does this work on just any IMAP server? Or does it require that the server specifically support it (with code) on the backend? And since Mulberry is open source now, is the license such that the code could be 'borrowed' and integrated in other clients? If not, I guess there would be nothing wrong with at least looking at how Mulberry implements it. I seem to recall something similar way back when we were using Netscape 4, but how it worked escapes me... I currently use a custom sync setup, but it isn't designed to work as efficiently or reliably as something like this. I do recall learning about ACAP a long time ago, and advocated for it for a while, but it never seemed to go anywhere. > 2) I like the ability to specify which "outgoing addresses to count as > mine". I guess by this you mean 'Identities'? If so, then yeah, they're very useful and I use them heavily in TB...