Re: Is anybody working on Mulberry now?

Gleason,

Of course anything new would not have the years of development behind it
that it takes to produce a well envisioned and implemented email client.

What you want is a client that has been around for years and has had frequent updates
throughout that time.  I know of only two
Thunderbird
The Bat
Others?

In spite of its diminutive namesake, The Bat is my choice.


Kenneth,

> On 12/13/2017 12:17 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> I have a log file of errors generated by Mulberry when trying to 
>> connect to, retrieve from and move emails from my ISP. They use 
>> IncrediMail, which has to be the worst IMAP server on the planet. It 
>> literally crashes Mulberry when you get over 25 emails in your inbox.

>> I'm in the process of moving over to gmail, because my ISP email is 
>> virtually unusable. I've been using Mulberry for years now, and no 
>> IMAP server I've ever used has been so indescribably horrible. 

> I continue to watch for a suitable replacement. I saw a candidate the 
> other day mentioned on the dovecot mailing list that I want to try. 
> (Dovecot is the IMAP server of choice on Linux.)

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojit%C3%A1

It is getting harder to find anything new.  I see this one is imap only.

> Other possibilities:

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_email_clients

> Things I need for my work flow include multiple identities and multiple
> servers. I'd love to see Mulberry's hierarchical inherited configuration
> but I doubt other clients have that.

Only Mulberry, I bet.

-- 

Gleason


-- 

Gleason