Re: Is anybody working on Mulberry now?

I use Thunderbird now and it is awful, terrible, and bad. I long so much 
for Mulberry.

On 12/18/17 12:16pm, Gleason wrote:
> Re: [Mulberry-discuss] Is anybody working on Mulberry now? Gleason,
>
> Of course anything new would not have the years of development behind it
> that it takes to produce a well envisioned and implemented email client.
>
> What you want is a client that has been around for years and has had 
> frequent updates
> throughout that time.  I know of only two
> Thunderbird
> The Bat
> Others?
>
> In spite of its diminutive namesake, The Bat is my choice.
>
>
> 	Kenneth,
>
> *> On 12/13/2017 12:17 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >> I have a log file of errors generated by Mulberry when trying to
> >> connect to, retrieve from and move emails from my ISP. They use
> >> IncrediMail, which has to be the worst IMAP server on the planet. It
> >> literally crashes Mulberry when you get over 25 emails in your inbox.
>
> >> I'm in the process of moving over to gmail, because my ISP email is
> >> virtually unusable. I've been using Mulberry for years now, and no
> >> IMAP server I've ever used has been so indescribably horrible.
>
> > I continue to watch for a suitable replacement. I saw a candidate the
> > other day mentioned on the dovecot mailing list that I want to try.
> > (Dovecot is the IMAP server of choice on Linux.)
>
> *> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojit%C3%A1 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojit%C3%A1>
>
> It is getting harder to find anything new.  I see this one is imap only.
>
> *> Other possibilities:
>
> *> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_email_clients 
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_email_clients>
>
> *> Things I need for my work flow include multiple identities and multiple
> > servers. I'd love to see Mulberry's hierarchical inherited configuration
> > but I doubt other clients have that.
>
> *Only Mulberry, I bet.
>
> /--
>
> Gleason/
>
>
>
> /--
>
> Gleason /