Re: Mulberry development
Kenneth Porter <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:56:14 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9EC20FA0B6124D34B76ADA26@[172.27.234.209]> |
--On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 1:51 PM -0500 Gleason <[email protected]> wrote: > The downside of that is that instead of rewriting the new tools and > technologies, you would be rewriting the well conceived and implemented > unique features of Mulberry. Not necessarily even an equal tradeoff, I > suspect. Free software tends to be scratching an itch of the programmer that writes it. I'd only be writing the parts that I used. I don't heavily customized Mulberry the way I see you describe, so I wouldn't be rewriting that part.