Re: Is anybody working on Mulberry now?

Gleason <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:23:19 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.mail.mulberry.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
------------10D0A309F324285A5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tanstaafl,

> On Tue Dec 19 2017 15:31:59 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Gleason
> <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Thunderbird evangelist.

> Long time user of the least broken IMAP client I've ever tried (tried
> most, including Mulberry). It has many warts, just far fewer than others.

>> I do pay close attention to email clients and what they offer. Have
>> done for a long time.

> Your observations say otherwise...

You doubt my veracity?

>> *>> ? Like the ability to customize visible columns in the message list,
>>>> separately for each folder, with a large selection of choices.
>>> ??? I've been doing that since.. .forever... natively.

>> *Well, not forever, I think.  I do distinctly remember those options not
>> being available a few years ago.

> And I do distinctly remember having made extensive customizations to the
> message pane for many, many years. At loeast since version 2.0.

The message list columns.  Size, date, memo, and folder can be useful in so=
me contexts.  Lots of other column headings
are possible and can be useful.  Especially if your client allows you to at=
tach a memo to an email,
as The Bat does so easily. =20

> So, much, MUCH longer than just a few years my friend.

It is starting to sound like we are failing to communicate.

>> As I say, I prefer the function built in.

> Me too... but Addons are one of the main reasons I like Thunderbird - I
> can customize it to MY needs/wants.

>> I personally have had situations where a needed plugin was no longer
>> compatible.

> Thats happened to me once or twice, but I soon learned a new and
> sometimes better way to do the same thing.

>> Lightening periodically going in and out of compatibility for
>> example.  It will be back in a while, but in the meantime, I am out=20
>> of luck.  Not acceptable.

> The Release version of TB and Lightning has never done this. Of course,
> if you play with pre-release versions, you will encounter the occasional
> issue like this, but surely you know this.

>> Yes, I use Daily because it has the latest features.

> There is your problem. Complaining about OCCASIONAL breakage in a DAILY
> build (some might call that ALPHA quality software) is plain asinine.

> That said, the reality is Thunderbird rarely gets new features, mostly
> you'll just benefit from early bug fixes that are too invasive to
> backport to the release version.

>> Like built in outgoing filters.

> Limiting yourself to only native/built-in features is missing out on one
> of the best things about Mozilla products.

> That said, checking when Thunderbird added the ability to customize the
> columns in the Message pane revealed that the native ability to filter
> on outgoing/Sent messages was added way back in version 38 over 2 years a=
go.

Message list.  My experience with Thunderbird goes back a lot further than =
that.  Yes, I
know outgoing filters outgoing messages has been available for a while.  My=
 comment was
that my early experience of Thunderbird was that it lacked features.  That =
has been
remedied in recent *years*.  But *I* still don't like the interface.  It is=
 subjective.

>> The Bat has no such requirement.  I use server side incoming
>> filters, so messages go where I want them, and The Bat doesn't care
>> what I want to use for a return address.

> The email client isn't thr critical part of this, the SMTP SERVER is. A
> properly configured SMTP server (postfix) will not allow you to
> impersonate someone else (send from just any address), and there is
> nothing 'The Bat' (or any other email client) can do about that.

And the fastmail smtp server is well aware of my aliases, so no problem.

>> I simply tell it to use whatever return address I like and there are no
>> unnecessary complications.
> Oh - been doing that for many many years using the 'Virtual Identity'
> Addon which simply lets me edit the From Header directly on the fly.

Yes, I can do that, but it is preferable that the software do it automatica=
lly lest I forget.

--=20

Gleason
------------10D0A309F324285A5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><title>Re: [Mulberry-discuss] Is anybody working on Mulberry no=
w?</title>
</head>
<body>
<span style=3D" font-family:'tahoma'; font-size: 10pt;">Tanstaafl,<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt; color: #800000;"=
><b>&gt; On Tue Dec 19 2017 15:31:59 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Glea=
son<br>
&gt; &lt;</b></span></span><a style=3D" font-family:'courier new'; font-siz=
e: 9pt;" href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a><span style=3D" f=
ont-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt; color: #800000;"><b>&gt; wrote:<b=
r>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800080;">&gt;&gt; Thunderbird evangelist.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt; Long time user of the least broken IM=
AP client I've ever tried (tried<br>
&gt; most, including Mulberry). It has many warts, just far fewer than othe=
rs.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800080;">&gt;&gt; I do pay close attention to email=
 clients and what they offer. Have<br>
&gt;&gt; done for a long time.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt; Your observations say otherwise...<br>
<br>
</span></span></span></span></b><span style=3D" font-family:'Tahoma'; font-=
size: 10pt; color: #000000;">You doubt my veracity?<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt; color: #800080;"=
><b>&gt;&gt; *&gt;&gt; ? Like the ability to customize visible columns in t=
he message list,<br>
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; separately for each folder, with a large selection of choi=
ces.<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt;&gt;&gt; ??? I've been doing that sinc=
e.. .forever... natively.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800080;">&gt;&gt; *Well, not forever, I think. &nbs=
p;I do distinctly remember those options not<br>
&gt;&gt; being available a few years ago.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt; And I do distinctly remember having m=
ade extensive customizations to the<br>
&gt; message pane for many, many years. At loeast since version 2.0.<br>
<br>
</span></span></span></b><span style=3D" font-family:'Tahoma'; font-size: 1=
0pt; color: #000000;">The message list columns. &nbsp;Size, date, memo, and=
 folder can be useful in some contexts. &nbsp;Lots of other column headings=
<br>
are possible and can be useful. &nbsp;Especially if your client allows you =
to attach a memo to an email,<br>
as The Bat does so easily. &nbsp;<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt; color: #800000;"=
><b>&gt; So, much, MUCH longer than just a few years my friend.<br>
<br>
</b><span style=3D" font-family:'Tahoma'; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;"=
>It is starting to sound like we are failing to communicate.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt; color: #800080;"=
><b>&gt;&gt; As I say, I prefer the function built in.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt; Me too... but Addons are one of the m=
ain reasons I like Thunderbird - I<br>
&gt; can customize it to MY needs/wants.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800080;">&gt;&gt; I personally have had situations =
where a needed plugin was no longer<br>
&gt;&gt; compatible.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt; Thats happened to me once or twice, b=
ut I soon learned a new and<br>
&gt; sometimes better way to do the same thing.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800080;">&gt;&gt; Lightening periodically going in =
and out of compatibility for<br>
&gt;&gt; example. &nbsp;It will be back in a while, but in the meantime, I =
am out <br>
&gt;&gt; of luck. &nbsp;Not acceptable.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt; The Release version of TB and Lightni=
ng has never done this. Of course,<br>
&gt; if you play with pre-release versions, you will encounter the occasion=
al<br>
&gt; issue like this, but surely you know this.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800080;">&gt;&gt; Yes, I use Daily because it has t=
he latest features.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt; There is your problem. Complaining ab=
out OCCASIONAL breakage in a DAILY<br>
&gt; build (some might call that ALPHA quality software) is plain asinine.<=
br>
<br>
&gt; That said, the reality is Thunderbird rarely gets new features, mostly=
<br>
&gt; you'll just benefit from early bug fixes that are too invasive to<br>
&gt; backport to the release version.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800080;">&gt;&gt; Like built in outgoing filters.<b=
r>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt; Limiting yourself to only native/buil=
t-in features is missing out on one<br>
&gt; of the best things about Mozilla products.<br>
<br>
&gt; That said, checking when Thunderbird added the ability to customize th=
e<br>
&gt; columns in the Message pane revealed that the native ability to filter=
<br>
&gt; on outgoing/Sent messages was added way back in version 38 over 2 year=
s ago.<br>
<br>
</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></b><span st=
yle=3D" font-family:'Tahoma'; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000;">Message lis=
t. &nbsp;My experience with Thunderbird goes back a lot further than that. =
&nbsp;Yes, I<br>
know outgoing filters outgoing messages has been available for a while. &nb=
sp;My comment was<br>
that my early experience of Thunderbird was that it lacked features. &nbsp;=
That has been<br>
remedied in recent *years*. &nbsp;But *I* still don't like the interface. &=
nbsp;It is subjective.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt; color: #800080;"=
><b>&gt;&gt; The Bat has no such requirement. &nbsp;I use server side incom=
ing<br>
&gt;&gt; filters, so messages go where I want them, and The Bat doesn't car=
e<br>
&gt;&gt; what I want to use for a return address.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt; The email client isn't thr critical p=
art of this, the SMTP SERVER is. A<br>
&gt; properly configured SMTP server (postfix) will not allow you to<br>
&gt; impersonate someone else (send from just any address), and there is<br>
&gt; nothing 'The Bat' (or any other email client) can do about that.<br>
<br>
</span></b><span style=3D" font-family:'Tahoma'; font-size: 10pt; color: #0=
00000;">And the fastmail smtp server is well aware of my aliases, so no pro=
blem.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" font-family:'courier new'; font-size: 9pt; color: #800080;"=
><b>&gt;&gt; I simply tell it to use whatever return address I like and the=
re are no<br>
&gt;&gt; unnecessary complications.<br>
<span style=3D" color: #800000;">&gt; Oh - been doing that for many many ye=
ars using the 'Virtual Identity'<br>
&gt; Addon which simply lets me edit the From Header directly on the fly.<b=
r>
<br>
</span></b><span style=3D" font-family:'Tahoma'; font-size: 10pt; color: #0=
00000;">Yes, I can do that, but it is preferable that the software do it au=
tomatically lest I forget.<br>
<br>
<span style=3D" font-family:'arial'; font-size: 9pt; color: #c0c0c0;"><i>--=
 <br>
<br>
Gleason</body></html>
------------10D0A309F324285A5--