Re: Is anybody working on Mulberry now?

Paul Schmehl <[email protected]> Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:47:30 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.mail.mulberry.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
And you, of course, are the arbiter of what is false and what is not.

What is the point of this crap? It has nothing to do with Mulberry and only 
reveals what a pompous ass you are.

--On December 19, 2017 at 4:39:51 PM -0500 Tanstaafl 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue Dec 19 2017 16:26:13 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Gleason
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> But of course, if you choose to blindly reject such an idea and the
>>> mountain of evidence in support of the fact that it isn't a generic
>>> Thunderbird problem, then by all means, go find another email client to
>>> rant about.
>>
>> Sounds like a problem respecting the intelligence and experience of
>> other people.
>
> What? Ignoring the fact that millions of others have no problems like
> the OP? Yeah, I guess you could say that...
>
> Respect, on the individual level, must be earned. When someone makes
> false claims that a piece of software is at fault when it isn't, yeah, I
> don't have any respect for such claims or the one making them.
>



Paul Schmehl, Retired
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
*******************************************
"It is as useless to argue with those who have
renounced the use of reason as to administer
medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson
"There are some ideas so wrong that only a very
intelligent person could believe in them." George Orwell