Re: Is anybody working on Mulberry now?

On 12/20/2017, 2:15:27 PM, Paul Schmehl <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, you are evangelizing.

No, I'm not.

> It's clear you don't see that, but it's obvious to an uninvolved
> observer.
That is hilarious, seeing as you are not (an uninvolved observer)...

It's clear you don't see the difference between evangelizing and
correcting false information, but that's not my problem...

> You have now dominated this list

Dominated the list? The list that has been virtually dead (like
Mulberry) for months, then when there is some traffic, someone
cluelessly rants about how bad TB is.

Whats to dominate?

> with a meaningless discussion

Depends - if someone learns something new, is it meaningless?

Of course, you actually have to be open to that...

> that no one cares about.

So... I think even Mulberry has a delete button?

> This is the Mulberry-discuss list, not the Thunderbird-discuss list.

Tell that to the two others who brought TB up first. All I did was
correct their bad/false information.

> Everyone gets that you are infatuated with Thunderbird and think it is 
> perfect.

Infatuated? Rotflmao! You have no clue. TB is loaded with warts, and
I've opened more bug reports and feature requests than I can count on
both hands and feet, most of which are ignored.

As I said before - it just sucks the least.

> Enough already.

I agree.

> I didn't join this list to be hammered with crap about other email
> clients.
Yet you keep hammering us with information about other clients - but at
least you are doing so in context with how perfect Mulberry is.