Re: Mulberry development
Gleason <[email protected]> Sat, 3 Mar 2018 13:43:03 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mulberry.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------76E76224EF9EEC6D97F9377C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Graziano, > Hello to everyone! > > > We are all here daily stuck in the tentative to keep the old, good > Mulberry alive... > > So I wonder: why we are unable to start the development of a new version? Shortage of people with sufficient time to spare. > I know it will be a really long journey, but if we will start probably > we will also able to finish.... the other way around is impossible. > > Cyrus is still maintaining the code, so why not thing about a new > development? > > We all know that MulberryMail is actually the best imap client > available on the market.. so I think it deserves the effort.... Certainly it does. I'm sure we would all be thrilled if you could step up and accept the challenge. That would involve resurrecting Linux, Windows and Mac versions, of course. The bad news is that Mulberry, in spite of all our good wishes, is probably dead. > > > Regards, > > --gra > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 17:17:42 -0500 > From: [email protected] > To: Cyrus Daboo <[email protected]>, Kenneth Porter > <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Mulberry-discuss] Mulberry development > Message-ID: <MTAwMDA0My5jcm9w.1520029070@quikprotect> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > > Lyrabee and Sebastian discussed High Sierra in November: > > I've only tried High Sierra on Macs with traditional hard drives, and > there > it works the same way it does with Sierra. I haven't had access to a Mac > with APFS yet. > > --On 3. November 2017 um 12:11:49 +0100 lyrabee <lyrabee at gmx.net> > wrote: > >> as i'm thinking about upgrading from sierra to high sierra i wonder, if >> mulberry will still work - due to apple's forced change to file system >> apfs - at least for macs with ssds? > > ----------------------------- > Ing. Graziano Previato > Mobile: +39-335-6413617 -- Gleason --------------76E76224EF9EEC6D97F9377C Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Graziano, <br> <br> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:[email protected]">Hello to everyone! <br> <br> <br> We are all here daily stuck in the tentative to keep the old, good Mulberry alive... <br> <br> So I wonder: why we are unable to start the development of a new version? <br> </blockquote> <br> Shortage of people with sufficient time to spare.<br> <br> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:[email protected]"> I know it will be a really long journey, but if we will start probably we will also able to finish.... the other way around is impossible. <br> <br> Cyrus is still maintaining the code, so why not thing about a new development? <br> <br> We all know that MulberryMail is actually the best imap client available on the market.. so I think it deserves the effort.... <br> </blockquote> <br> Certainly it does. I'm sure we would all be thrilled if you could step up and accept the challenge. That would involve resurrecting<br> Linux, Windows and Mac versions, of course.<br> <br> The bad news is that Mulberry, in spite of all our good wishes, is probably dead.<br> <br> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:[email protected]"> <br> <br> Regards, <br> <br> --gra <br> <br> <br> <br> <br> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- <br> <br> Message: 1 <br> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 17:17:42 -0500 <br> From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]" moz-do-not-send="true">[email protected]</a> <br> To: Cyrus Daboo <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:[email protected]" moz-do-not-send="true"><[email protected]></a>, Kenneth Porter <br> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:[email protected]" moz-do-not-send="true"><[email protected]></a>, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:[email protected]" moz-do-not-send="true">[email protected]</a> <br> Subject: Re: [Mulberry-discuss] Mulberry development <br> Message-ID: <MTAwMDA0My5jcm9w.1520029070@quikprotect> <br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed <br> <br> <br> Lyrabee and Sebastian discussed High Sierra in November: <br> <br> I've only tried High Sierra on Macs with traditional hard drives, and there <br> it works the same way it does with Sierra. I haven't had access to a Mac <br> with APFS yet. <br> <br> --On 3. November 2017 um 12:11:49 +0100 lyrabee <lyrabee at gmx.net> wrote: <br> <br> <blockquote type="cite">as i'm thinking about upgrading from sierra to high sierra i wonder, if <br> mulberry will still work - due to apple's forced change to file system <br> apfs - at least for macs with ssds? <br> </blockquote> <br> ----------------------------- <br> Ing. Graziano Previato <br> Mobile: +39-335-6413617 <br> </blockquote> <br> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Gleason</pre> </body> </html> --------------76E76224EF9EEC6D97F9377C--