Acked-by: [was: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] enter.c: Use wmem*() functions with] wide-character strings

On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 05:03:59PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 04:22:53PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > This improves readability, and makes it more type safe (wmemcpy(3)
> > doesn't use void*).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]>
> > Cherry-picked-from: neomutt.git 7df621a105e2 (2024-05-09; "Use wmem*() functions with wide-character strings")
> > [alx: Adapted diff to mutt; changed commit message]
> > Cc: Greg KH <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]>
> 
> Don't know if we are doing acks, but if so:
> 
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

As we are just going back to working with patches on the ML I would
suspect that we are not doing acks.

But, should we? I know how it works, but what is it good for?

I guess it might make sense in big projects where some domain expert
can ack a patch and the BDFL then sees it's OK to apply. I don't see
that necessity for mutt.