Re: [PATCH] Switch ci image to debian:trixie container.

"Kevin J. McCarthy" <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Feb 2026 06:48:25 +0800

Newsgroups	gmane.mail.mutt.devel
Message-ID	<aZOeuad5Kyhb5SJi@qinghai>

On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 04:25:36PM +0100, Rene Kita wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 08:40:04PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>> As with Arch, the latest shellcheck is giving (IMO) unhelpful errors.
>> For now I'm turning it off, but invite someone who cares to fix it and
>> re-enable it.
>
>As I said, I will take care of this and prepare a patch.

Thanks Rene!

>> ---
>> Since we're switching the sr.ht builds to use a variety of systems
>> and possibly Arch, I thought it might be a good idea to run Debian as
>> our gitlab CI.
>
>I suggested Arch because it's quite bleeding edge and usually sticks
>close to upstream. AFAIK it's the same for Alpine, but Arch is glibc
>while Alpine is musl.
>
>We can do Alpine, Arch, FreeBSD and OpenBSD on sr.ht. I can drop Arch
>and add NetBSD on my sr.ht repo. That makes NetBSD a bit of second class
>citizen when it comes to testing, but at least I will notice if
>something breaks.

That sounds fine with me.

>I'll wait for a decision about -pedantic before submitting the patches,
>though.

I'll give until Friday before I push it up.

>> So I've created and pushed up a debian:trixie container in our registry,
>> and tried switching over to that.
>>
>> If you think Debian Trixie isn't a good idea, please just say so.  :D
>
>I already said so, but I'm totally OK with using it. ;-)o

Great.  I'll push this up and switch us over later today.

-- 
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)