Re: Applying patches from mailing list

Crystal Kolipe via Mutt-dev wrote in
 <[email protected]>:
 ...

(murderer style citation skipped.)

 |[.] although that seems like a niche case.

Must be said though that dkim is per-domain, so you seem to
support "the other approach" that seems to have the desire to add
support for forbidding "explosion" meaning mailing-list targets?
I for one am totally against this, the "iterated DKIM" should not
introduce anything like that.  It should be a cryptographic helper
of SMTP that allows to link a message to a domain, no tracking, no
flow control, nothing.  Only being able to crypt-verify, however,
up to the original sender, which is new (anyway).

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)