Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] Improvements to calculation of sizes

On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 01:55:39AM +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:

>On 2026-02-17T06:46:05+0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>> Since we won't fully get rid of the --without-wc-funcs until (probably)
>> 2.5.0, and since this is more of a type-safe addition than fixing any real
>> overflow issue, I'm inclined to create a new branch, e.g. future/2.5.0, and
>> push this commit there.
>>
>> Once we cut the 2.4.0 release, I'll pull patches out of that branch into
>> master. Does that sounds okay?
>
>I can keep the patches for you; you don't need to pull them now.  I'll
>take care of rebasing them if needed, which will reduce the amount of
>work you'll have to do.  Just let me know when more or less I should
>resend, and I'll resend.
>
>But of course, feel free to apply to any branch, if that's simpler for
>you.  :)

I can do both!  :-)

Since you have Developer credentials, you can push/rebase future/2.5.0 
too.  I'll push the patch up there shortly, and when you, the other 
Developers, or I think about it can rebase commit(s) there periodically.

-- 
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=KsQY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----