Re: [PATCH] wip: change ISSPACE to use ascii whitespace check.
"Kevin J. McCarthy" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mutt.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aZcG9zVyjPK08Ob2@qinghai> |
On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 08:30:56PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: >I'm not dead set against it, but I've never thought the macros or >naming were confusing. > >Making the implementation of each the same seems like a good idea, but >I think it would be a shame to get ride of the skip_xxx() and is_xxx() >macros. To me they make the code more readable, not less. I will add that veering into needing to implement our own strchrnul() and using not-yet standardized C constructs like '?:' feel like it's going a bit too far though, for a minor cleanup. Mutt moves slowly, and still is meant to work on (somewhat) older systems. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEiXWpszqjeRA4XFMIre92hIAxa9oFAmmXBvcACgkQre92hIAx a9p3IxAA4ZJyAPi6H1bp/08KFAiqxYcXYoz4aMYfPhYZBTT1ZLcd9JLbrq0GgiUG EXHRtFCsPgEMPsPa58mpldSnbiDt3/R7qaecEQuKu7tTifu3AC0W+Hdi0WsKuCbz nNwIxQm0co4GwweJober3yhGqp9H4pJlZQW5ozvNxbamn03Y9gnw5be8igppgscL 9k7oF4/mrgL0OCYdP01DOOXfr8zhe4tB4KvVa/sNQrZQDUsBDbsqGkLQ0cUFaBNq le8v4ZqOeZnHdU3eHOIW0SY9VIruCZYtenqE9LMAGoC3FTHTHmHM57lfR0hFnWSZ oT4ul8j4gzVpIIjugYA0ATdj28FkEJO4H7zMQjtWX+FovhenAX0a8hAIP/mxF8MH m9YxZKSvYX7ZNFKpEIgXahVt/nfOA6qUAi/FX1aZvoF8xzaREXP4NnKntF34yAGn CToYTxLm/mwjFHSo4PLHGtsR/kx0UAoAHxG3UMaC4YTXNdnUn7WBR6DsqjhAP9BY S/jAMUYInSHIQyHiNL6EoME4MGtd3G1RtTxThlL1ow0lti3/ayNOlMI3kQCeIfrO q+6roAIz+5UpLWHrep+51TNVLU/65TcVOnwqqS0HBUfO12yTugIOil1ykx2sn4Bj Kly3CWY0tTocHqwJr35hoefvSKBRldktkTJHsicCDABImTL3xGE= =hmwg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----