Re: [PATCH] wip: change ISSPACE to use ascii whitespace check.

Hi Kevin,

On 2026-02-19T20:49:59+0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 08:30:56PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > I'm not dead set against it, but I've never thought the macros or naming
> > were confusing.
> > 
> > Making the implementation of each the same seems like a good idea, but I
> > think it would be a shame to get ride of the skip_xxx() and is_xxx()
> > macros.  To me they make the code more readable, not less.
> 
> I will add that veering into needing to implement our own strchrnul() and
> using not-yet standardized C constructs like '?:' feel like it's going a bit
> too far though, for a minor cleanup.  Mutt moves slowly, and still is meant
> to work on (somewhat) older systems.

Sure; I was just floating ideas.  We can incorporate them slowly, to
make sure users can still use mutt(1).


Have a lovely day!
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=FpgV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----