Re: [PATCH] Drop -pedantic from CFLAGS

On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 03:39:48PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 05:07:35PM +0100, Rene Kita wrote:
>>On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 05:57:28PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>>>I'd like to hear other opinions before we completely drop it from our
>>>default compiler options.
>>
>>I prefer removing it, but am OK with keeping it also. -pedantic is too
>>strict. To make sure we are compatible with other compilers we should
>>actually build with them.
>
>It seems like now-a-days, especially when using more recent versions 
>of the C standard, this is the common view.
>
>So, I'm inclined to give it a try.
>
>If anyone else would like to chime in, please do so this week. 
>Otherwise I'll assume this isn't controversial and I'll commit the 
>patch.

I've pushed this up.

-- 
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=1ofp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----