Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] Do not use shell's old-style command substitution

Crystal Kolipe via Mutt-dev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.mutt.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 11:53:24AM +0100, Rene Kita wrote:
> To quote the BashFAQ[0]:
> Why is $(...) preferred over `...` (backticks)?
> 
> The `cmd` backtick format is the legacy syntax for command substitution,
> required only by more than 30-year-old Bourne shells. ...

Personally, I find the backtick format infintely more readable than $(...).

I'm mainly mentioning this just incase anyone else feels the same way but
doesn't want to be the first to comment.  Feel free to ignore.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.