Re: [PATCH] Add $weed_unfold option.

On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via Mutt-dev wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 11:00:22AM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>>The ticket creator was not happy because their SpamAssasin headers 
>>were "nicely" formatted, and Mutt was unfolding them and making them 
>>less readable.  But that's not necessarily the case for all headers.
>>
>so it would seem most logical to make the option a list of headers 
>like $ignore/$unignore, no?

Not necessarily.  The amount of change and complexity compared with the 
utility and number of users of the functionality also needs to be 
considered.

I personally don't think this is a feature with a broad user base, so 
feel like a small uninvasive change is a better trade off.  The ticket 
author themself said all headers was an acceptable second choice for 
implementation.

But if other people chime in disagreeing, it's definitely doable to make 
a new set of ignore/unignore for unfolding.

-- 
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=1Sdi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----