Re: [PATCH] Improve mutt's random data generator.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 06:54 +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:

>(replying to the sub-thread with Kurt lower): I realized the return 
>type is actually ssize_t, but I chose to work with size_t in this case 
>because of the:
>
>    if (res < length_requested)
>    {
>      length_requested -= res;
>      random_bytes += res;
>    }

I hope that code is not executed if the return value is -1.