Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] enter.c: Use wmem*() functions with wide-character strings
"Kevin J. McCarthy" <[email protected]> Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:10:12 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.mutt.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 11:17:34AM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: >On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 11:56:19PM +0100, Alejandro Colomar via Mutt-dev wrote: >>This avoids an explicit size multiplication, which can overflow the >>calculation. > >My concern is the conversation in the other thread about wc support, >and portability, and --without-wc-funcs. Otherwise this looks fine. I've merged this from future/2.5.0 branch into master now. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEiXWpszqjeRA4XFMIre92hIAxa9oFAmo0zzQACgkQre92hIAx a9rbzA//b6noblPOGB144Z+fAkvtfvIATOEQknpziw/jbNps7Sjz0D0srPtA+Ms3 eOKzL5Plmr8sluqC5HS6yeKJS8Nzwr1O+S/j6AbOV/SzUXITmvH96FBuGduwGlJV drYNpHfzOoX6cwfrEYtBoMJIZtj2S8jSliEzGaw1DdchqGmYFSOm9IJ2feJatBPN qhhr0Ec8tg2Rf3CKxtWcym00cWXUmFFJhek+KIwLK4eMtYBCqhyI5h6bi6HnJZAV EtBSXcOWsYseBfObKYiSuw/8/bgmTKiSz+d0dkc+Lwz3xBMzoZ7U5454P80dDMJD yuPZ5h6vGsaqObCm0DERixR6eIy4Z1AJ0AycpuOqKhZ5J3cqtIUWB/CD2IrzwG+8 bap2HZVk28O/MjoCr7o+QhGVh5RfqRnZ/6j6MYD+gD7STvKgl1YAxJSysjHIi+3z xeWc36JxMpXLiObwpw3rbO9Ocre1uE7ANGlk2UC7YHD7ochh17A90vNIEdB6oUnX YZSk819tOmjHRfPRHTF4z/3pnj9T/va50FQ9DX8TifTUdD+U9dfvH5+oPDpNljF5 mg08Yy/XQ7HvHS0jkd+GoO3Nv2PfY716RQ4x23WFB9J1IkR/l6EekSabMYjbFCZ/ x2GiARPwrx6Kq6XoIgsde81xef6Q7aq7y615kQfosE6KCaM96A4= =w5Jn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----