Re: Message-ID, privacy and uniqueness

"Kevin J. McCarthy" <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 12:58:48PM +0000, Arnt Gulbrandsen 
> wrote: 
>> I think it's clear that we aren't going to increase the amount 
>> of entropy in the localpart. Should we still guard against the 
>> hostname information leak, or just accept that as a non-ideal 
>> state of things? 
> 
> I don't think there is much appetite for tweaking the default 
> message-id format again at this point.

Yes. I'll answer and close that issue accordingly.

Arnt