Re: [PATCH] wip: Add forward-message-refs function.

On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 08:26:54PM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 12:26:01PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar via Mutt-dev wrote:
>>I personally don't forward enough messages that it could become
>>annoying.  However, I expect if it could become annoying to someone,
>>they could enable it as 'yes', and then edit out the headers in the
>>editor in the few cases where they want it removed.  In general, I
>>suspect one will want either yes or no, and ask-yes will be a bit rare,
>>with ask-no being more rare.  Thus, I expect this manual editing would
>>be rare.
>>
>>We'd need to allow editing the References field (currently, it's not,
>>AFAIK).
>
>Not sure about that, but I'll think about it!

Ah, I see what you are saying.  I think allowing modifying the 
References header is a bad idea, but removing it is another story (for 
the forwarding case).  I'll add that support.

-- 
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=wus5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----