Re: mutt mbox format for new mailboxes

Kurt Hackenberg <[email protected]> Fri, 16 May 2025 15:31:34 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.mail.mutt.user
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:05:25PM +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:

>I'm on mutt 2.2.13-1. Is the following what you expected?
>
>--- 
>/tmp/test.maildir/cur/1747420397.M988463P24699Q1.rain.cave:2,S	2025-05-16 
>19:33:17.000000000 +0100
>+++ /tmp/test.mbox	2025-05-16 20:00:52.063481577 +0100
>@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
>+From [email protected] Fri May 16 20:00:52 2025
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 (UTC)
>+Status: RO
>+Content-Length: 43
>
> From the beginning, mbox was a bad design.
>+

Yes. We see that Mutt did not add a '>'.