Re: ignoring expired s/mime certificates for encryption

--U8bkkbuBgQCeZ6o9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline

Dear Kevin,

Am 01.07.2026 schrieb Kevin J. McCarthy:
> I'm sorry to say the news is not great.  The mutt GPGME code was written
> quite a while ago.

Oh, that's good to know. For me "classic mode" sounded like something to
avoid but in hindsight "it is better tested" should have been a hint to
me to not switch to gpgme (which I did a couple of months ago due to
some problems with classic mode).


> I'm not sure if it does now.  I'll check with Werner and see if there are
> updates.

Thank you!

What are the overall plans with respect to s/mime? Will "classic mode"
be the future or gpgme? Should I invest more time to optimise and
improve classic mode instead of gpgme?


Best,
Robert

--U8bkkbuBgQCeZ6o9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ow78
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--U8bkkbuBgQCeZ6o9--