Re: user-visible goals
Chuq Von Rospach <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ng |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 1, 2004, at 8:31 PM, Keith Moore wrote: > Who said users were realistic? We're talking about what users want, > not what they can get. Maybe you are. I'm looking to find what we can build, not what we can promise. > p.s. If you use the term "return receipt" you need to define what > you mean. There's not a single obvious meaning of the term, and the > differences between the meanings are significant. Terms like > "delivery notification" "receipt notification" and "read notification" > are more precise, but even then there can be a lot of wiggle room. > true, and thanks for clarifying. And perhaps all can be allowed, if the receiving user permits it, but I think my initial intent was "delivery notification" (it's stuffed in their mailbox), because that's what most existing sites that support this support, but users are probably hoping for "read/open notificiation" (someone looked at it), which is what Lotus Notes hopes to provide, and does so very badly.