Chains of trust vs. PKI
Paul Crowley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ng |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <87hdy973ib.fsf_-_@saltationism.subnet.hedonism.cluefactory.org.uk> |
Resting our whole authentication framework on PKI isn't the right way to go about things. Read Ellison and Schneier, "Ten Risks of PKI": http://www.schneier.com/paper-pki.html I would much rather see an SPKI-like approach to naming, in which we use local information to bind locally meaningful names to public keys. This is a far better fit to practical security problems. At the very least, if you can persuade yourself to think the SPKI way for a moment it will give you an entirely different perspective on many issues to do with naming. See also Zooko's triangle: http://zooko.com/distnames.html -- __ Paul Crowley \/ o\ [email protected] /\__/ http://www.ciphergoth.org/