Clarifying addressee roles

Bill McQuillan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.ng
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It seems that the addressing header fields (To:, From:, Cc:, Sender:,
Reply-To:, Resent-*) are overloaded in meanings to a confusing degree.

I get messages have To: fields containing: my email address, a mailing list
address, a mailing list member's address (usually in a reply from another
mailing list member), or gibberish (usually on spam). The same thing
happens on the other fields.

These fields are inherited from a time when it was thought that e-mail
generally had a source person and a set of destination persons and since
then each new mechanism (auto-responders, mailing lists, forwarders,...)
has tried to shoehorn new conventions into the existing ones which seem to
me to be more appropriate to paper memos.

I think that it would be useful to recognize more roles in the interchange
of e-mail and to further allow for straight-forward addition of new roles
(perhaps even ad hoc).

e.g.: (intentionally ugly example syntax!)

To(list): Next Generation e-Mail <[email protected]>
From(individual): Joe Listmember <[email protected]>

is distributed by Majordomo as:

To(list): Next Generation e-Mail <[email protected]>
From(individual): Joe Listmember <[email protected]>
To(individual): Bill McQuillan <[email protected]>

and then from pobox.com as:

To(list): Next Generation e-Mail <[email protected]>
From(individual): Joe Listmember <[email protected]>
To(individual): Bill McQuillan <[email protected]>
From(forwarder): <[email protected]>
To:(individual): Bill Mcquillan <[email protected]>

Please understand that this is just to give a simple example so that it can
be torn apart.  :-)
-- 
Bill McQuillan <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.