RE: Why are we here? What are our goals?
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.ng |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2A1D4C86842EE14CA9BC80474919782E011133C6@mou1wnexm02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
Another set of plausible items to add would be - Alignment with Web Services - Mandated 8-bit clean transport (e.g. DIME). - Moving beyond the text email with attachments idea. I don't think that a replacement for SMTP is worthwhile unless it provides a major increase in functionality. I would want to see something that integrates the functionality of instant messaging, video conferencing, mail, audio, video p2p and resource syndication. Oh and be much less complex to implement than current email, spam resistant etc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathaniel Borenstein [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 4:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Why are we here? What are our goals? > > > > [Sincere thanks to Paul for starting this list.] > > As I stated on another mailing list, I'd like to see our email-ng > efforts start with requirements analysis. However, I've always found > it useful to start by compiling a wishlist, as raw data for > requirements abstraction and tradeoff analysis. So I'd like > to start a > wish list of "plausible stuff it would be cool to include in > email-ng." > Here's what I've got so far (I don't actually advocate all > of these): > > -- internationalization, esp. of addresses > -- enhanced tracing mechanisms > -- generalized challenge/response mechanisms > -- transport-level authentication > -- binary transport (phasing out C-T-E's) > -- Cleaner separation of header, envelope, and body > -- structured local-part syntax > -- economic mechanisms (postage, attention bonds) > > I suggest that we try to grow this into a highly inclusive list of > "desirable things" and then attempt to determine a sensible subset to > work on. -- Nathaniel >